关于检察院在“少捕慎押”中的问题与完善——以最高检少捕慎押典型案件为例

目录一、绪论...(一)研究意义......。。。。。。。。。(二)国内外研究综述.....…(三)研究方法...3二、检察院在“少捕慎押”中的探究..。(一)“少捕慎诉慎押”的政策内涵...(二)“少捕慎押”的概念与作用..(三)羁押必要性审查的概念6(四)羁押必要性审查与“少捕慎押”的联系...6三、检察院在“少捕慎押”中的问题....8(一)公诉机关对社会危险性的评价缺乏统一标准8(二)羁押必要性审查难以贯彻落实..................10(三)“少捕慎押”检察实践难以与刑事司法制度相互配合..·11(四)“少捕慎押”后的风险难以控制.......12(五)传统司法观念无法适应新的刑事司法政策............13四、检察院在“少捕慎押”工作中的完善..........14(一)明确社会危险性的评价标准.......14(二)明确羁押必要性审查的流程和内容.16(三)加强刑事司法制度间的相互协调...」18(四)加强对“少捕慎押”对象的监管20(五)转变司法机关的司法观念21结语.....22参考文献.........21致谢..关于检察院在“少捕慎押”中的问题与完善一以最高检少捕慎押典型案件为例摘要：“少捕慎诉慎押”是我国新时代重要的刑事司法政策，是宽严相济的刑事政策在司法领域的具体化，是轻罪治理体系的必然要求，在这一政策背景下，检察院起着承上启下的关键作用。虽然该刑事司法政策的推行对检察院的“少捕慎押”起到了指导与引领作用，但检察院在“少捕慎押”的工作中仍然存在许多问题，例如对社会危险性的评价缺乏统一标准、羁押必要性审查难以贯彻落实、“少捕慎押”后的风险难以控制、“少捕慎押”检察实践难以与其他刑事司法制度相互配合等，我们应当针对上述问题采取一系列的完善措施。以此为题，本文一共分为四个部分：第一部分是对题目的意义和概念以及国内外研究现状进行系统阐述。第二部分则是对“少捕慎诉慎押”这一刑事司法政策的内涵以及检察院“少捕慎押”的概念进行全面的剖析与解释。第三部分则是以最高检少捕慎押典型案件为例，对检察院在“少捕慎押”中存在的问题进行分析。第四部分则是针对检察院在“少捕慎押”中所产生的问题提出完善建议。关键词：“少捕慎押”；检察院：羁押必要性审查：认罪认罚从宽制度On the Issues and Improvements of theProcuratorate in "Less Arrest and MoreCaution"-Taking the typical case of thehighest prosecution,less arrest,andcautious detention as an exampleByWen Jia NingDecember,2023Abstract:"Less arrests,cautious prosecution,and prudent detention"is an importantcriminal justice policy in China's new era,embodying the principle of combiningseverity with mercy in the judicial field.It is a necessary requirement of the lightpunishment governance system.Under this policy background,the procuratorate playsa crucial role as a bridge.Although the implementation of this criminal justice policyguides and leads the procuratorate in being less aggressive and more cautious,thereare still many issues in the work of "less arrests,cautious detention,"such as the lackof unified standards for evaluating social dangerousness,difficulty in implementingnecessary detention reviews,difficulty in controlling risks after "less arrests,cautiousdetention,"and difficulty in coordinating procuratorial practices with other criminaljustice systems.We should take a series of measures to address the above issues.Withthis topic in mind,this article is divided into four parts:the first part systematicallyexplains the significance,concept,and current research status of the topic.The secondpart comprehensively analyzes and explains the connotation of the criminal justicepolicy of "less arrests,cautious prosecution,and prudent detention,"as well as theconcept of "less arrests,cautious detention"by the procuratorate.The third partanalyzes the problems existing in the procuratorate's "less arrests,cautious detention"through typical cases of the Supreme People's Procuratorate's practice.The fourth partpresents comprehensive suggestions for addressing the issues arising from the 'detainfewer,hold carefully'policy in the Procuratorate.Keywords:"Be cautious when arresting less";The procuratorate;Necessity reviewof detention;The leniency system for admitting guilt and punishment一、绪论(一)研究意义“少捕慎诉慎押”是宽严相济刑事司法政策的延续和具体化，是党和国家结合新